Wes Turner - Part B Evaluation

From Foss2Serve

Revision as of 20:03, 30 October 2017 by Wturner (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Approximately 2,250 repository results on "education"
KDE Education
- 23 code locations, none on GitHub
- 10 similar projects
- Information provided:
  - Project Summary
    - News
    - Settings
    - Sharing Widgets
    - Related Projects
  - Code Data
    - Languages
    - Cost Estimates
    - Security
  - SCM Data
    - Commits
    - Contributors
  - Community Data
    - Users
    - Ratings & Reviews
    - User & Contributor Locations
21 repository results on "humanitarian"
29 repository results on "disaster management"
Why do so many projects do not have activity information available?
- "Finally, because Open Hub is weighting recent contributions more heavily, projects that do not have recent analysis because of problems with their code locations or other problems blocking Open Hub from collecting and analyzing code will show the Not Available icon."
Organizations
- Most Active Orgs
  - Commits / affiliate
- Orgs by 30 Day Commit Volume
  - Organization
  - Type
  - Size
  - # Projects
  - # Affiliates
  - 30 Day Commits
- Newest Organizations
  - Number of Projects
- Stats by Sector
  - Sector
  - Average Commits / Affiliate
  - # of Orgs

Last commit for OpenMRS Core in OpenHub was 10/10/2017
Last commit for OpenMRS Core in GitHub was 10/10/2017
For me, they had the same information, but that was because the most recent. commit was on a GitHub location. I expect they could differ if the most recent commit was not to a GitHub location.

Benefits: The sites provide different information and focus, with OpenHub focusing perhaps more on the context of the information within organizations and affiliates and GitHub focusing perhaps more on one specific site (GitHub) and code modifications. Searching both gives you more context and greater depth of detail.
Drawbacks: Keeping up with a site you are working on requires substantially more work if you are using both sites.

Evaluation Factor	Level (0-2)	Evaluation Data
Licensing	2	Mozilla Public License, version 2.0
Language	1	Java 95.4% SQLPL 3.0% GAP 0.7%
Level of Activity	2	Lower activity in the last 2 quarters, but still active
Number of Contributors	2	271
Product Size	1	3,736,160
Issue Tracker	2	~1200 Ready for work, ~10,500 closed, 2017-09-12 17:39:00 GMT+0000 fifth ticket created, Active
New Contributor	2	Development Environment-yes/Communication-yes/Discussion-yes/web presence-yes
Community Norms	2	Talk: Lots of requests for help, lots of announcements, welcomes. Code of Conduct: Reason for code of conduct, dos and don'ts, penalties and expectations
User Base	2	Talk is active and shows lots of users, download instructions, user instructions and discussion
Total Score	16

Contents