JPearce Project Evaluation
(Difference between revisions)
(OpenMRS evaluation) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I would rate OpenMRS on size/scale/complexity as a two because the codebase is large, but they are | + | I would rate OpenMRS on size/scale/complexity as a two because the codebase is large, but they are definitely beginner-friendly. I would rate it as very active given the number and frequency of commits. |
I would also consider it popular with 4.2 Stars and 3,719 Downloads this week. The number of downloads per day ranges from 300 to more than 600. 75,090 in the past year. | I would also consider it popular with 4.2 Stars and 3,719 Downloads this week. The number of downloads per day ranges from 300 to more than 600. 75,090 in the past year. | ||
The community appears very friendly and welcoming. It does look like a good community. | The community appears very friendly and welcoming. It does look like a good community. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In terms of Mission Critical Criteria-Approachability, OpenMRS seems 3-Ideal-Obvious link to get started and detailed instructions. The approachability also seems excellent. | ||
Revision as of 00:34, 17 November 2016
I would rate OpenMRS on size/scale/complexity as a two because the codebase is large, but they are definitely beginner-friendly. I would rate it as very active given the number and frequency of commits.
I would also consider it popular with 4.2 Stars and 3,719 Downloads this week. The number of downloads per day ranges from 300 to more than 600. 75,090 in the past year.
The community appears very friendly and welcoming. It does look like a good community.
In terms of Mission Critical Criteria-Approachability, OpenMRS seems 3-Ideal-Obvious link to get started and detailed instructions. The approachability also seems excellent.
