User:Ssheth
(Difference between revisions)
(→Project Evaluation Activity) |
(→Project Evaluation Activity) |
||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
=== Project Evaluation Activity === | === Project Evaluation Activity === | ||
− | [[File: | + | [[File:Mifos_Eval.xlsx]] |
Revision as of 02:27, 30 October 2014
Contents |
Swapneel Sheth
Swapneel Sheth is a Lecturer in the Computer and Information Science department at the University of Pennsylvania.
His research and teaching interests are Software Engineering, Privacy, and the Web.
Stage 1 Part A
Intro to IRC
Part 1
- How do people interact?
- In an informal manner
- What is the pattern of communication?
- Usually question and answer - somebody has a question or a problem, other tries to help solve it
- Are there any terms that seem to have special meaning?
- The chat bot commands
- Can you make any other observations?
- It's nice to have the meeting transcribed by meetbot in a relatively easy manner, with annotations
Part 3
I've been following the #ushahidi channel periodically, but it seems to have very little activity.
I've looked at other interesting (to me) open-source channels - #rvm, #ruby-lang, #rubyonrails. These are a lot more active and seem to have two kinds of questions.
- I'm stuck.. help me with X
- In this case, people are trying to install/work with some software/framework/library and getting error messages. This seems like a faster, 90s version of StackOverflow for people to get answers.
- What is a good way to do X?
- In this case, people are unsure what's a "good" (optimal, efficient, faster, better) way of doing something - A or B. They want advice from the more-seasoned users in the channel. Comparing to StackOverflow, I see this as a big advantage as something "subjective" is not a good question to ask on StackOverflow.
Anatomy of a FOSS Project
The Sugar Labs Project
- Community
- Activity Team
- Develops and Maintains the activities; recruits developers.
- There are 2 coordinators and a lot of contributors.
- Development Team
- Builds and Maintains the core Sugar Project.
- There is no coordinator and four people (assuming they're contributors?) listed
- Documentation Team
- Provides high quality documentation (learner's manual, programming references, and tutorials).
- There is no coordinator here as well and two editors with their areas of speciality listed.
- Activity Team
- Tracker
- Types/Categories of Tickets
- Defect, Enhancement, Task
- Information available for each ticket
- The usual bug tracking categories - reported by, priority, component, severity, cc, bug status, owned by, milestone, version, keywords, distro/os, description, change history, timestamps.
- Types/Categories of Tickets
- Repository
- Web-based common repo, but it's git so everything is distributed and everyone has a "local repo".
- Release Cycle
- The roadmap is updated at the start of each release cycle. Each release cycle contains development, beta, RC, final releases.
The Sahana Eden Project
- Community
- Developers
- This is for people interested in contributing to the development effort of Sahana or for those who want to use Sahana in their own projects.
- Unlike Sugar Labs, names and roles are not mentioned.
- Training and guidelines are provided here.
- Testers
- They want three types of testers - non technical users, developers, sysadmins.
- Again, names and roles are not mentioned.
- Training and guidelines are provided here as well.
- Designers
- This is for graphic designers who have experience in CSS and HTML.
- Training and guidelines are provided here as well.
- Developers
- Tracker
- The default page shows reports, instead of tickets.
- Types/Categories of Tickets
- Defect/Bug, Enhancement, Task, Documentation
- Information available for each ticket
- They use Trac as well - so most of the information is similar as Sugar Labs. Reported by, priority, component, keywords, due date, cc, owned by, milestone, version, launchpad bug, description, attachments, change history, timestamps.
- Repository
- Web-based common repo.
- Release Cycle
- The current milestone (0.9 Medway) is 90% complete and 3 years late. It still a number of open tickets.
- The future milestones (1.0 Avon and 2.0) don't have a date set, but they describe the key features required.