User:Mgondree
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Observation on flow: Interactions can be many-to-many, but the meeting was fairly organized and people were polite, so it appeared more like one-(at-a-time)-to-many. There is a solid delay in the log sometimes so people are careful about addressing each other directly so readers can disentangle the threads. | Observation on flow: Interactions can be many-to-many, but the meeting was fairly organized and people were polite, so it appeared more like one-(at-a-time)-to-many. There is a solid delay in the log sometimes so people are careful about addressing each other directly so readers can disentangle the threads. | ||
| − | Bonus: | + | '''Bonus''': |
* Q: Why didn't Heidi and Darci's actions get picked up by the meetbot? | * Q: Why didn't Heidi and Darci's actions get picked up by the meetbot? | ||
* A: ... didn't they? The actions showed up [http://www.foss2serve.org/images/foss2serve/4/43/MousetrapBot2013-03-01.pdf here]. I guess they didn't show up [https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/MouseTrap/Meetings/20130301 here]. Maybe its just the difference between the two different types of minutes that meetbot produces, that one version has action items and the other does not. I read something in [http://meetbot.debian.net/Manual.html the meetbot manual] that if a nick does not speak during the meeting, then an action tagged with their nick may not be produced (but that does not appear to be the case here). | * A: ... didn't they? The actions showed up [http://www.foss2serve.org/images/foss2serve/4/43/MousetrapBot2013-03-01.pdf here]. I guess they didn't show up [https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/MouseTrap/Meetings/20130301 here]. Maybe its just the difference between the two different types of minutes that meetbot produces, that one version has action items and the other does not. I read something in [http://meetbot.debian.net/Manual.html the meetbot manual] that if a nick does not speak during the meeting, then an action tagged with their nick may not be produced (but that does not appear to be the case here). | ||
Revision as of 01:24, 14 March 2017
Mark Gondree is an Assistant Professor in the Computer Science department at Sonoma State University. Sonoma State is one of 23 campuses in the Cal State system and the only public liberal arts college in California. SSU has over 240 full-time tenured/tenure-track faculty and over 8,000 undergraduate students.
Dr. Gondree's research focus is on computer security and computer security education. He is an evangelist for (and a designer of) games intended to engage students with security topics, and is a PI of the TableTop Security project. His professional website is http://www.gondree.com/.
Contents |
IRC Assignment
Stage 1 Activities >> Intro to IRC (Activity)
Part 1
Observation on flow: Interactions can be many-to-many, but the meeting was fairly organized and people were polite, so it appeared more like one-(at-a-time)-to-many. There is a solid delay in the log sometimes so people are careful about addressing each other directly so readers can disentangle the threads.
Bonus:
- Q: Why didn't Heidi and Darci's actions get picked up by the meetbot?
- A: ... didn't they? The actions showed up here. I guess they didn't show up here. Maybe its just the difference between the two different types of minutes that meetbot produces, that one version has action items and the other does not. I read something in the meetbot manual that if a nick does not speak during the meeting, then an action tagged with their nick may not be produced (but that does not appear to be the case here).
Part 3
Summary of 24 hrs of observing #a11y on irc.gnome.org (3/13 - 3/14/17) TBD
