Wes Turner - Part B Evaluation
(Difference between revisions)
(→OpenMRS Evaluation) |
(→OpenMRS Evaluation) |
||
| Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Copyright and Licensing ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * OpenMRS: MPL v2.0 | ||
| + | * incubator-fineract: Apache License Version 2.0 | ||
| + | * regulately: Can't find one. | ||
Revision as of 20:22, 30 October 2017
Contents |
Github
- 15,860 repository results on "education"
- Recent(-ish) commit activity, by week and by day of the week
- 332 repository results on "humanitarian"
- Last commit on Apr 22, 2017
- 174 repository results on "disaster management"
OpenHub
- Approximately 2,250 repository results on "education"
- KDE Education
- 23 code locations, none on GitHub
- 10 similar projects
- Information provided:
- Project Summary
- News
- Settings
- Sharing Widgets
- Related Projects
- Code Data
- Languages
- Cost Estimates
- Security
- SCM Data
- Commits
- Contributors
- Community Data
- Users
- Ratings & Reviews
- User & Contributor Locations
- Project Summary
- 21 repository results on "humanitarian"
- 29 repository results on "disaster management"
- Why do so many projects do not have activity information available?
- "Finally, because Open Hub is weighting recent contributions more heavily, projects that do not have recent analysis because of problems with their code locations or other problems blocking Open Hub from collecting and analyzing code will show the Not Available icon."
- Organizations
- Most Active Orgs
- Commits / affiliate
- Orgs by 30 Day Commit Volume
- Organization
- Type
- Size
- # Projects
- # Affiliates
- 30 Day Commits
- Newest Organizations
- Number of Projects
- Stats by Sector
- Sector
- Average Commits / Affiliate
- # of Orgs
- Most Active Orgs
OpenMRS
- Last commit for OpenMRS Core in OpenHub was 10/10/2017
- Last commit for OpenMRS Core in GitHub was 10/10/2017
- For me, they had the same information, but that was because the most recent. commit was on a GitHub location. I expect they could differ if the most recent commit was not to a GitHub location.
Benefits and Drawbacks of using Both Sites
- Benefits: The sites provide different information and focus, with OpenHub focusing perhaps more on the context of the information within organizations and affiliates and GitHub focusing perhaps more on one specific site (GitHub) and code modifications. Searching both gives you more context and greater depth of detail.
- Drawbacks: Keeping up with a site you are working on requires substantially more work if you are using both sites.
OpenMRS Evaluation
| Evaluation Factor | Level (0-2) |
Evaluation Data |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing | 2 | Mozilla Public License, version 2.0 |
| Language | 1 | Java 95.4% SQLPL 3.0% GAP 0.7% |
| Level of Activity | 2 | Lower activity in the last 2 quarters, but still active |
| Number of Contributors | 2 | 271 |
| Product Size | 1 | 3,736,160 |
| Issue Tracker | 2 | ~1200 Ready for work, ~10,500 closed, 2017-09-12 17:39:00 GMT+0000 fifth ticket created, Active |
| New Contributor | 2 | Development Environment-yes/Communication-yes/Discussion-yes/web presence-yes |
| Community Norms | 2 | Talk: Lots of requests for help, lots of announcements, welcomes. Code of Conduct: Reason for code of conduct, dos and don'ts, penalties and expectations |
| User Base | 2 | Talk is active and shows lots of users, download instructions, user instructions and discussion |
| Total Score | 16 |
Copyright and Licensing
- OpenMRS: MPL v2.0
- incubator-fineract: Apache License Version 2.0
- regulately: Can't find one.
