MouseTrap Requirements
(Difference between revisions)
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Questions== | ==Questions== | ||
+ | (The following are questions intended as jump-off points for discussion during the meeting) | ||
+ | *Rewrite using current GTK and OpenCV APIs? | ||
+ | *Small, single-purpose module that enables the user to use *other* applications (including assistive applications), or application that encompasses multiple features? | ||
+ | *Focus on forehead, or scrap and use OpenCV's newest haars APIs (related to #1)? | ||
+ | *How to account for spasticity -- should this be a priority or worked on down the road? | ||
+ | *There are a number of features in Mousetrap that never worked in the first place, but intended for future development (finger-tracking, plug-in architecture), should those be preserved, or scrapped? (related to #2) | ||
+ | *Priority: to fix, or to introduce something that works? | ||
+ | *Interface -- should it be simple, or full-featured? Should it simply be a program that moves the mouse with head movements, and leave the other features to other applications (Dasher and built-in on-screen keyboard and so forth)? | ||
+ | *"Personas" and HCI -- to be discussed (different people with differing needs/disabilities) -- should we account for this, or try to design for a "wider audience" and work on more specific cases later? | ||
==Meeting TBD== | ==Meeting TBD== |
Revision as of 19:30, 12 April 2013
Contents |
This page was created to address Mousetrap's formal Requirements
Questions
(The following are questions intended as jump-off points for discussion during the meeting)
- Rewrite using current GTK and OpenCV APIs?
- Small, single-purpose module that enables the user to use *other* applications (including assistive applications), or application that encompasses multiple features?
- Focus on forehead, or scrap and use OpenCV's newest haars APIs (related to #1)?
- How to account for spasticity -- should this be a priority or worked on down the road?
- There are a number of features in Mousetrap that never worked in the first place, but intended for future development (finger-tracking, plug-in architecture), should those be preserved, or scrapped? (related to #2)
- Priority: to fix, or to introduce something that works?
- Interface -- should it be simple, or full-featured? Should it simply be a program that moves the mouse with head movements, and leave the other features to other applications (Dasher and built-in on-screen keyboard and so forth)?
- "Personas" and HCI -- to be discussed (different people with differing needs/disabilities) -- should we account for this, or try to design for a "wider audience" and work on more specific cases later?