Regression Test Assignment
Title |
Regression Test Assignment |
Overview |
Participants write unit tests (in GoogleTest) to establish reliable regression tests for a C++ class |
Prerequisite Knowledge |
Students need to have installed and programmed unit tests with GoogleTest. They should also know how to run a coverage analyzer and interpret its results. Intermediate knowledge of Git version control is required. |
Learning Objectives |
Students should write unit tests and use a coverage analysis tool to identify test cases they may be missing |
Directions:
Students:
Overview
Your job is to test the GoalUndo class thoroughly so that developers can verify that it is working correctly and have regression tests for when the code is changed during maintenance. That means that your job is not only to verify that the current solution code is working, but that any implementation of the existing functions work as described in the documentation.
Instructions
- Fork the GoalUndo repo into your own GitHub space
- Clone your fork onto your own computer
- Set the upstream remote in case the instructor needs to give you changes to the code during the exam
- Working within a new branch, add unit tests that thoroughly test the functionality as described in the documentation
- Use your judgment -- based on what you learned about testing thoroughly -- to decide when you have written sufficient tests to be confident that any correct implementation will pass your tests and that any incorrect implementation will fail.
- Once you are done testing, push your changes into your fork (keeping it in your branch)
- Submit the url and branch name of the branch on your fork with your tests
- Make sure you have only pushed changes to the
GoalUndoTest.cpp
file. No other files should be changed on your GitHub fork. Any commits to your fork after the deadline will be considered late.
Instructors:
Make your own local clone of the GoalUndo repository and change the code so that it will work as documented in some cases but not in others (such as changing conditional operators or types of control structures). To grade each student, fetch the student's fork and then merge with the changes you made to inject intentional errors into the code. Run the student's tests and confirm that tests fail where they should be testing the functionality broken by the errors you introduced.
Deliverables:
A fork of the GoalUndo repository, with added tests
Assessment:
Grading Rubric
10% did you follow the instructions accurately? 20% did you demonstrate recommended practices with git and GitHub? 20% were unit tests written and formatted following recommended practices? 30% how thoroughly did you test the existing code? 20% do your tests verify that each function acts as documented as regression tests?
Additional Information:
Knowledge Area/Knowledge Unit |
Software Engineering |
Topic |
Unit Testing, Test Coverage |
Level of Difficulty |
Writing thorough unit tests will take intermediate knowledge of object oriented programming and predicting possible future bugs will take advanced reflective cognition |
Estimated Time to Completion |
The assignment should take from 1-3 hours of work and is recommended as an equivalent to a relatively small programming assignment. |
Materials/Environment |
Need to have a working C++ development environment with GoogleTest and gcov installed |
Author |
Kevin Buffardi |
Source |
Kevin Buffardi |
License |
Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License