User:Jfrench

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(DELIVERABLE: Stage 1 - Part A - Project Anatomy Activity)
(DELIVERABLE: Stage 1 - Part A - Project Anatomy Activity)
Line 46: Line 46:
  
 
''Summary of Contact Pages:''  None of the teams had contacts cross-listed (each team had unique members).  All three teams used and IRC Channel.  In addition, the Documentation Team and the Activity Team had a mailing list.  Development & Documentation both are without coordinators.
 
''Summary of Contact Pages:''  None of the teams had contacts cross-listed (each team had unique members).  All three teams used and IRC Channel.  In addition, the Documentation Team and the Activity Team had a mailing list.  Development & Documentation both are without coordinators.
 +
 
''Activity Team'':  The activity team is responsible for keeping track of all of the activities available.  This includes finding and working with developers and other teams.  They can't just have random activities from different people.  Though they encourage developers, they provide resources and oversight for the organized development of Sugar.
 
''Activity Team'':  The activity team is responsible for keeping track of all of the activities available.  This includes finding and working with developers and other teams.  They can't just have random activities from different people.  Though they encourage developers, they provide resources and oversight for the organized development of Sugar.
 +
 
''Development Team:''  The development team is responsible for actually building the Sugar environment.  This includes working to fix any problems in addition to adding new features that need to be added to Sugar.
 
''Development Team:''  The development team is responsible for actually building the Sugar environment.  This includes working to fix any problems in addition to adding new features that need to be added to Sugar.
 +
 
''Documentation Team:''  The Documentation Team is responsible for creating and updating the user manuals.  They need to have different versions of the manuals in different languages.  For example, they are working on a Spanish version for the Sugar FLOSS manual.
 
''Documentation Team:''  The Documentation Team is responsible for creating and updating the user manuals.  They need to have different versions of the manuals in different languages.  For example, they are working on a Spanish version for the Sugar FLOSS manual.

Revision as of 01:48, 6 August 2015

Jean (Jeannie) H. French

Jean H. French, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computing Sciences at Coastal Carolina University (CCU). CCU is a public, liberal arts institution minutes from Myrtle Beach, SC. CCU offers undergraduate, graduate, and Ph.D. programs to nearly 10,000 students. The Department of Computing Sciences offers Bachelor of Science degrees in Computer Science, Information Systems, and Information Technology.

Dr. French's main areas of teaching are in Web programming, multimedia, and data sciences. Classroom projects often involve real-world problems for students to solve for the university or industry. Dr. French is highly involved in academic assessment as chair of departmental assessment and ABET accreditation, and also as chair of assessment for all university academic programs. Dr. French also serves as the vice chair of Faculty Senate.

When not teaching and assessing, she is busy raising her two little girls (4 and 6) with her husband. Though she enjoys living in Myrtle Beach, she is one of six children from Boston, Mass. and enjoys heading home to visit family.

DELIVERABLE: Stage 1 - Part A - Intro IRC Activity

Part 1 How do people interact? The interaction was polite and informal conversation with questions, answers, comments, 'at-a-boy confirmations, and some emoticons.

What is the pattern of communication? Is it linear or branched? Formal or informal? One-to-many, one-to-one or a mix? The pattern of communication is informal and branched with mostly one-to-many. For example, informal speech was mentioned in the previous question. The conversation was branched because in the middle of a related thread of comments, there were side comments like "Sorry, Firefox creashed" by Heidi. The conversation was mostly one-to-many because one might have a question, but the others chimed in with suggestions.

Are there any terms that seem to have special meaning? info, action, topic all seem to have special meanings and these terms were evaluated in a special way in the final PDF meeting notes.

What advantages might IRC have over other real-time communication methods (like Google Chat or Facebook Messenger?) Are there potential disadvantages? While I used the Firefox browser plug-in, it was not necessary. There were a number of ways to connect to the conversation. The disadvantage is that this is only text-based. Except for texting content, there was no additional way to convey information such as images, video, or sound.

Can you make any other observations? I noticed that it looked like if a user wanted to get the attention of a particular user, they would type the name of that user.

Bonus question: Why didn't Heidi and Darci's actions get picked up by the meetbot? I really don't see this. There were three #action notes in the conversation by users darci and heidi. All three were included in the meeting summary PDF 18:12:58 <darci> #action amber will try graphviz This was indicated in the summary at 1.c. 18:51:28 <heidi> #action Heidi look into the status of releases in the next week. This was indicated in the summary at 1.h. 19:06:06 <darci> #action Darci will find John some easy Python projects to work on. This was indicated in the summary at 2.a.

For Part 2: N/A

For Part 3: I connected to the Mousetrap IRC. There were no active conversations when I was logged in, but I reviewed a number of the logs. There do not appear to be many users in any of the logs and the most active user is stoney. During one meeting, users kevin-brown and heidie had little to report, but also not much feedback to user stoney. User stoney had over 20 entries (from 17:06:33 to 17:13:28) with no response from either of the other users and user stoney pointed out the "silence." During one of the logs, it appeared to be a meeting with only stoney and the log seemed not to be used for conversation, but as a record of individual activity. The act of ending the meetings seems to just be an end meeting command with no confirmation that the meeting is about to end. It appears if some minutes have gone by without activity that the meeting is simply ended without comments about the next meeting. I suspect there must be other ways the users are communicating???

Part 4 (optional): N/A


DELIVERABLE: Stage 1 - Part A - Project Anatomy Activity

SUGAR LABS PROJECT

Summary of Contact Pages: None of the teams had contacts cross-listed (each team had unique members). All three teams used and IRC Channel. In addition, the Documentation Team and the Activity Team had a mailing list. Development & Documentation both are without coordinators.

Activity Team: The activity team is responsible for keeping track of all of the activities available. This includes finding and working with developers and other teams. They can't just have random activities from different people. Though they encourage developers, they provide resources and oversight for the organized development of Sugar.

Development Team: The development team is responsible for actually building the Sugar environment. This includes working to fix any problems in addition to adding new features that need to be added to Sugar.

Documentation Team: The Documentation Team is responsible for creating and updating the user manuals. They need to have different versions of the manuals in different languages. For example, they are working on a Spanish version for the Sugar FLOSS manual.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Events
Learning Resources
HFOSS Projects
Evaluation
Navigation
Toolbox