User:Tharvey/ircQuestions

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with " #How do people interact? #What is the pattern of communication? Is it linear or branched? Formal or informal? One-to-many, one-to-one or a mix? #Are there any terms that seem...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
  
 
#How do people interact?
 
#How do people interact?
 +
#* Parallel typing with race conditions (e.g. "jinx" comment). Hashes indicate commands that tell the meetbot to tag a significant note. Chair appears to make most of the commands.
 
#What is the pattern of communication? Is it linear or branched? Formal or informal? One-to-many, one-to-one or a mix?
 
#What is the pattern of communication? Is it linear or branched? Formal or informal? One-to-many, one-to-one or a mix?
 +
#*Fairly informal discussion, with some typing collisions (expected). Very on-topic. Mostly linear, with short branches that end. Some one-to-one, but lots of one-to-many (the trunk) followed by the short branching conversations.
 
#Are there any terms that seem to have special meaning?
 
#Are there any terms that seem to have special meaning?
 +
#* All of the commands (info, action, etc with hashes), also john wrote a non-verbal
 
#Can you make any other observations?
 
#Can you make any other observations?
 +
#*Disadvantage of this system: it requires people to type quickly to participate. They could do some typing ahead, but not the responses.
 +
#*Advantage: I cannot tell gender, age, race in this environment. Anyone could join a software project and participate without suffering bias, as long as they were careful about what/how they share.

Revision as of 00:15, 13 March 2017

  1. How do people interact?
    • Parallel typing with race conditions (e.g. "jinx" comment). Hashes indicate commands that tell the meetbot to tag a significant note. Chair appears to make most of the commands.
  2. What is the pattern of communication? Is it linear or branched? Formal or informal? One-to-many, one-to-one or a mix?
    • Fairly informal discussion, with some typing collisions (expected). Very on-topic. Mostly linear, with short branches that end. Some one-to-one, but lots of one-to-many (the trunk) followed by the short branching conversations.
  3. Are there any terms that seem to have special meaning?
    • All of the commands (info, action, etc with hashes), also john wrote a non-verbal
  4. Can you make any other observations?
    • Disadvantage of this system: it requires people to type quickly to participate. They could do some typing ahead, but not the responses.
    • Advantage: I cannot tell gender, age, race in this environment. Anyone could join a software project and participate without suffering bias, as long as they were careful about what/how they share.
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Events
Learning Resources
HFOSS Projects
Evaluation
Navigation
Toolbox